Archive for Exhibitions: Away

LA: Research and House Viewing Day One

There are very few words to describe the experience of walking into a home that is brilliant, thoughtful and incredibly well-designed. I can’t express enough gratitude towards the people who have made it possible for me to see some of John Lautner’s homes in person – two of them on my first day here. Out of respect for the privacy of the owners I won’t go into detail here or post the photos I was lucky enough to take. It was at time overwhelming to walk into these homes and see the breathtaking view first hand, to feel the warmth of the interior, and fully understand the experience of the indoor/outdoor connection Lautner believed in. As I wandered around these homes I felt like I was in a museum, and the owners were so kind to let me wander like I was in a museums. I think I said the word “incredible” a million times today. For some reason that was what kept coming out of my vocal chords.

I also spent the morning/afternoon at the Getty Center viewing the wonderful Julius Shulman photo archive while narrowing down the focus of my research. Since I’m hoping to depend heavily on photography for the exhibition, seeing what is available first hand was immensely helpful. I’ve narrowed it down to about 8-9 structures, spanning Lautner’s entire career. Tomorrow I’ll view the drawings, etc. from the specific structures. I’m sure it will prove to be even more helpful.

I got so caught up at the research library with the photographs that I ran out of time, sadly missing the Irving Penn exhibition. We were lucky enough to have a Penn photograph on loan from the Museum of Contemporary Photography at Columbia College in a 2008 show, UNITED in Art. I am very interested in his non-fashion work – I find fashion photography akin to eating ice cream. Enjoyable, but in small doses. The Getty exhibition focuses on a series of images Penn did in the 1950s, which are portraits of people (everyday working folk) holding tools of their trade. They are photographed as typologies, almost scientific portraits documenting working class labor. The more I think about this, the more I may just have to go back and see it.

Leave a Comment

Some Geordies Like Art

If London felt charming, then Newcastle was like a nice bear hug from your grandfather. If your grandfather liked to drink to all night and yell loudly about football. Nestled on the Tyne River, the city is loaded with history (which to my surprise people seemed quite knowledgeable about) and tells another story of post-industrial hardships. I’ve been in England long enough to start noticing the differences in the accents; in Newcastle people sound more Scottish. For example, the word “do”. In London it sounds like “due”. In Newcastle it sounds like “dew”. I found it comforting for some reason; Geordies (as they are called) seem very rugged, hardworking and hard playing, and maybe just a little bit brash at times. I did inadvertently get mooned here after all.

DSCF2577
(studying the mating rituals of the Geordies from my hotel window. apparently that involves dressing like superheros.)

In the art world circles run small and I found myself on a tour yesterday with the incredibly nice and lovely Paul, the brother of a friend of a friend. Michael, the brother, happens to be in Chicago, as a resident of InCUBATE, a space run by some friends of mine. I’d been e-mailing with Michael about my trip here and he kindly put me touch with his brother and off Paul and I went yesterday for the Newcastle art tour.

My favorite stop on the tour was on the outskirts of the city center, in an area known as Byker. The amazing gallery space Waygood (in the city center) is under massive reconstruction and while the new building is being redone, the studio spaces are located in a giant old furniture factory in Byker. The building itself is pretty isolated in a largely industrial area that is slowly being torn down (Paul informed me that a newly empty lot across the street was until recently, an emptied industrial building). It looked like Flint in a way and I immediately felt a warm cozy feeling. We toured through some of the studios, including Michaels, and went to the communal kitchen on the first floor for some tea. The first floor also has a space reserved for exhibitions, a way for the artists with the studios in the building to experiment with displaying their work or contextualizing it with other work – when the exhibitions are up a public reception is held. Truly brilliant.

During tea, James Johnson-Perkins joined us from a nap on the couch and we ventured to his studio to see his work. During the entire time I was cursing myself for the dead batteries in my camera; particularly when we went up the narrow staircase to Perkins’ studio. Standing floor to ceiling were huge lego-bots made out of plastic Tupperware-type containers in bright primary colors. Shelves lined the walls with hundreds of smaller, yet equally satisfying, lego-bots made out of actual legos. Some had guns, some wore skirts. Paul asked if one was wearing a chef hat. Perkins shrugged and said, sure. On the floor was his latest project, an in-progress dinosaur made out of Ken-dolls tie wrapped together in a big blob.

There seems to be this underlying theme of good silly humor in a lot of the art I saw made by the Northerners. At Vane Gallery there was work up by Jock Mooney, an Edinburgh-born artist. There were small black and white drawings lined on the wall, simple illustrations that were absurdist and induced many giggles in me, for example a dog with four very saggy breasts looks out to the viewer, and above it simply says “hello boys”. When I flipped through Mooney’s book of drawings and photographs of his sculptures I stopped at a drawing of a pasty in mid flight. Underneath in a hand-drawn font of mock-horror was written “The Pasty”. I bought a copy of the book…art about pasties?! If only I could curate an entire show with that theme…for now that page may have to be cut out of the book and framed on my wall. And I’m not going to go into Mooney’s sculptures, grotesquely awesome and made out of lightweight plastic. They need to be seen in person to be fully appreciated.

At the Laing Gallery I had a pleasant surprise of seeing an installation by Song Dong, based on his “Writing the Diary With Water” work. Song Dong is a prolific artist whose work beautifully and subtly addresses issues of the passage of time and the often futile nature of life. “Writing the Diary With Water” is part of a daily ritual that Song Dong does, where he literally writes a daily diary with water. At the Laing, Song Dong had set up a series of rocks across the gallery floor, about 2 feet by 3 feet. Next to the rocks were pillows and a container of water with a brush. Gallery visitors were encouraged to sit at a rock and write their own entries with water. A few children sat at rocks and wrote their names and then slowly the water evaporated. As with most of Song Dong’s work, its simple but extremely effective.

My first day in Newcastle was spent at the BALTIC Center for Contemporary Art and was largely my reason for visiting Newcastle. The BALTIC, much like MASS MoCA, is housed in a converted factory. The Baltic was a flour and grain mill that closed in the early 80s. With a lot of help from the government (as is typical with the arts in England), almost the entire interior was ripped out (including well over 100 silos) and rebuilt into five floors of art space.

BALTIC

The BALTIC is impressive from the outside, the towering brick structure looking over the Tyne. But from the outside the Millennium Bridge (for pedestrians and bikes only, designed by Wilkinson Eyre and Partners) stole the show. It’s very sculptural and takes on different shapes and characters depending on which side you view it from. Looking at it from the Newcastle side, it has less of an anthropomorphic quality, looking more like something from a Miro painting. As I wandered up to the entrance of the bridge I noticed a sign, announcing “lift times” for that day. Lift? Hmm. The next one was about 5 minutes away so I walked down the river a bit and waited. Sure enough, a big horn sounded and a man came over a loud speaker, cheerily kicking everyone off the bridge – and then it started to lift. The bottom part, the actual part you walk on, began to rise up, the row of steel wires barely creaking with effort as it rose. It was breathtaking as the shape started to completely change as the bottom rose up, visually criss-crossing with the top part of the structure. No boats were around to make the passage underneath, so it paused briefly then began the descent. Impressive.

after

up

When I made my way into the BALTIC, I went first to the top floor (to my dismay the rooftop restaurant was closed for remodeling) to check out the viewing box. Another view of the bridge and of the city – I had a sneaking suspicion that for some, the draw of the BALTIC is the view up there.

endangered birds

The exhibitions at the BALTIC were hit and miss – a Yoshitoma Nara show that was fun, I’ll admit it. The stuff is cute. He worked with an architect to create three structures out of scraps of wood (one structure was sourced locally in Newcastle which had some amazing windows). Nara’s work filled the inside, creating a bizarre environment of ugly materials painted pastel colors and filled with images of Nara’s misplaced children and pets.

The group show, Double Agent, was on loan from the ICI London and had some interesting work – particularly photos by Phil Collins of art world people (curators, etc.) in the form of portraits taken in the style of a head shot. Collins had permission to slap the person as hard as he could before the photo was taken. He has had no trouble finding people to be in the photos, including the two curators of the Double Agent exhibition, looking startled with a big red mark along the side of their faces. How far will people go to be included? Pretty far.

The exhibition also had a video piece by the Polish artist, Artur Zmijewski. He brings together four groups of people in a big warehouse space: Polish nationalists, socialists, Christians and Jews. He gives them each a big sheet of paper mounted on stretcher bars. Each group wears the same color t-shirt according to their association. They are asked to paint symbols that are important to them, then they are asked to paint over each other’s work, over and over and over again. It gets pretty ridiculous and destructive but it’s also really poignant and entertaining. Sure he’s manipulating people’s emotions and their actions but that’s sort of the point, I think.

I liked the BALTIC, but beyond the factory converted building, it seems very very different than MASS MoCA. I won’t expound on that here, you’ll have to take me for a beer when I get back if you want to talk about it.

I’m now in Birmingham and preparing for my presentation…so far I’ve met some nice people here for the conference, bonding in our mass confusion of how to check into the dorm rooms…you never know at these things how you will end up befriending people.

(special thanks to Paul for showing me around! Here he is on the left with Dee and Pat of the wonderful Waygood Gallery)

-3

Comments (4)

London

London is charming. Granted I kept a pair of rose-colored tourist glasses on for much of my time there, happy to breathe in a city again. It also helped that for some reason my budget hotel offered me a cozy room with it’s own private garden, where I spent a few mornings basking in the sun over morning tea. I’m not a picky traveler, I don’t intend to spend a lot of time in my room anyway, but being surrounded by beautiful flowers in my backyard managed to melt my hardened traveler’s shell:

A lot of London cracked my shell actually:

St. Paul’s Cathedral:
st. paul's
Huge, old, beautiful. I sat through a half hour express lunch service like a good guilty Catholic, mostly staring at the light hitting the gilded gold on the statues. Then I trudged my way up the 530 or however many stairs to catch the view:

millenium bridge, tate modern

But a definite highlight of the Cathedral were two video works on display inside the chapel by Bill Viola. Which apparently is old news, St. Paul’s had his work on display way back in 2004 (along with Tracy Emin) in a show depicting contemporary images of Christ. Who knew the Brits were so progressive?

bill viola video inside st. paul's

Another good way to see the city was the Tate to Tate boat ride, literally shuttling people between Tate Modern and Tate Britian. I had read that Damien Hirst actually designed the decoration of the boat and I was quite excited to see a polka-dot covered boat pull up to the dock. A bright pink “TATE” flag flew on the stern…yet for some reason (bad luck I guess) this boat was not doing the Tate to Tate tour that time. Thanks to Flickr, I found out later the only thing I really missed inside were more polka dots. Way to go Hirst!

But I digress, this is (as my Time Out London guidebook obediently told me) a fantastic way to see a lot of sights in a small amount of time. The Eye of London, Westminster Abbey, London Bridge, Big Ben…in about 30 minutes no less:

thames

westminister abbey

london eye

I actually took an almost break for a half a day and spent some time in Hyde Park, per the recommendation of a wise friend. I got off the tube at Notting Hill and found my way into the entrance to the park near Kensington Palace. The crowds kept me from paying the entrance fee to the Palace, instead I kept on track of having more of a day breathing in London than seeing the sights.

sunken garden

DSCF2236.JPG

DSCF2237.JPG

serpentine lake

I sat in the shade for much of the late morning and afternoon, going from one tree to another around the park, mostly near the Princess Diana fountain. A police-escorted horse-drawn carriage passed by carrying Some Very Important Person but I continued to sit lazily under my tree. My one “art goal” for Hyde Park was Serpentine Gallery, co-directed by Hans Ulrich Obrist, an amazing curator and master of the artist interview. The show on display was Richard Prince, a sort of mini-retrospective of car hoods, joke paintings, nurse paintings, record covers, Marlborough men and a few sculptures thrown in for good measure. I like Prince’s work and see the validity in his use of media-soaked imagery…although I did have trouble grasping his newer work, aka the De Kooning series. Maybe I’m conditioned to seeing his work in a certain way and the fact that he’s doing something less immediately satisfying is actually my problem, not his. Most likely that is the case.

Outside of the gallery was a new architectural installation by Frank Ghery:

ghery at serpentine

In honor of my day of lazying about, I took a few minutes to sit under the wood and glass canopy, and thankfully, for once, not thinking about the episode of the Simpsons that Ghery guest-starred on where he crumpled up a piece of paper and threw it on the ground, then picked it up and turned it into a design for a building. The piece at the Serpentine is all angles and no aluminum; lots of cast shadows and wide open steps. I could have gone without the frosting on the glass, but once again I’ll humbly defer to that being my problem, not his.

ghery at serpentine

The bookstore at the Serpentine, by the way, is worth the trip alone. I practiced much self-restraint from blowing my meager savings on buying and shipping a giant box of art books back to the US.

One last art note, the ICA is programming an ambitious exhibition called “Nought to Sixty”, a presentation of sixty projects from emerging British and Irish artists happening over six months that started in May and lasts until November. For many of them this is their first major exhibition – I made it to a Nought to Sixty opening for The Hut Project, a group of three artists based in London. Their exhibition was half “retrospective” and half artist archive detailing pretty much every creative endeavor they’ve undertaken individually and collectively. From stacks of books on Duchamp and a massive installation of brown packing tape to rejection letters from galleries, The Hut Project definitely knows how to highlight the many absurdist sides of the art world.

the hut project, ICA

the hut project, ICA

Finally, I’d like to commend London on the amazingly clear and informative signs on the Tube. Chicago take note: see how easy it can be to show people a big map at each station, one on each side of the platform that shows clearly if they get on this train where it will take them! And electronic signs that give really accurate estimates as to the length of time until the next train arrives! No more staring down the dark hole down the tracks, anxiously craning your neck hoping to see the glimmer of train headlight knowing your wait is soon over! Think how much easier life could be for everyone involved in public transportation. Think how much happier people could be! It’s not that complicated, I swear!

the brits can do signage

Next stop: Newcastle.

Leave a Comment

Liverpool: Deriving Myself Crazy

A person from Newcastle that I’ve befriended and have been e-mailing with over the course of my trip pointed out the fact that Manchester is based more on the grid system and cities like Liverpool and London are much older thus the streets follow ancient waterways and other landmarks, which may be the reason I really enjoyed Liverpool. I wish I had more than one day to spend there (especially a not-Saturday) to spend more time wandering in general directions, similar to what the Situationists coined “the dérive” or to drift through a city. Maybe it’s not drifting in a specific sense when you have a destination in mind, but I’m not a purist.

Apparently I’m not much of a day trip planner either. I went to Liverpool on a Saturday, and that Saturday happened to be during the tall ships festival, which I didn’t know about until I saw the line up of huge skeletal wooden frames in the distance:

DSCF1905.JPG

I’m familiar with tall ship festivals as I’ve made trips to a few places around the Great Lakes to see them: Detroit and Saginaw to name a few. Marquette, my current home, is actually bringing a tall ship into Lower Harbor in August as part of “Pirate Fest”. I’m organizing a workshop at the museum for kids to make pirate flags for it.

I made my way through some pedestrian areas, taking alleys and empty streets with close-set buildings lining them, but always heading towards the water. It was quite enjoyable and I saw some public art, graffiti, and a few swanky tucked away bars waiting for night to fall to open. Liverpool definitely felt more textured, less polished:

liverpool

liverpool

liverpool

While maybe it is true that Liverpool is in as much of a state of change and new building as Manchester there seems to be character being retained in Liverpool. True, I saw just as many cranes in the sky in Liverpool, and they have their own central mall (still in development) that was just as terrible as Manchester’s, plus it was outside so it felt like Disneyland too. But Manchester’s buildings seemed to be waiting for the glossing over…sitting sad and just waiting. Liverpool’s building still seemed to be breathing. Perhaps I’m getting to esoteric with bricks, so I’ll move on.

My plan was to wander from Lime Street Station towards the harbor, find my way to the Tate for a visit, then wander back towards the Station going a way that seemed closer to the Walker Gallery. The closer I got to the harbor though, and Albert Dock (where the Tate is located) I saw more masses of people. And I mean a lot of people.

tall ships vs. klimt round 5

Albert dock is basically one giant square with water in the middle. And water surrounding it on the outside except for the side connect to the the land. Apparently because there were so many people they were herding them in one direction, which I found out when I unknowingly started to walk towards the “exit” side. A nice policeman stepped in front of me and asked me what I was doing and where exactly I was going. I was a bit shocked and intimidated so I muttered something about being new to town and was looking for the art museum, yes the Tate. He pointed back in the direction I was coming from “follow the crowds and mind your purse”.

So in with the crowds I started to walk, a good 15 minute walk onto the pier to get to the Tate. They had set up a que on the right for people wanting to see the boats. There were about 300 people in line. Stay to the left to go to the museum. I stayed to the left. As I was walking I started to notice the signs for the Gustav Klmit show at the Tate and then it all started to come together: I had picked probably one of the worst possible days to come here. And the next few hours were probably going to involve me elbowing my way through crowds of people either here for the boats or for Klmit, or both.

I started a mental race between the boats and Klmit. Que for the boats, about 300 people. Que for Klmit, about an hour’s wait for entry. Not bad Klmit!

tall ships vs. klimt round 4

He had some tough competition, the flimsy paper signs pointing to the exhibition flapped in the incredible wind that was pounding the harbor. The boats had lots of people dressed up keeping the waiting crowds entertained – clowns, people dressed up in a big fake cloth tub. Sometimes the entertainment stood in front of the Klmit signs. I felt sorta bad for him, but not bad enough to wait an hour and pay 10 pounds to see the show. Instead I saw a nice print show from the Tate’s collection, watched a bit of a Francis Bacon film (“Francis, isn’t art about creating order out of chaos?”) then decided to head back. I skipped the Beatles Museum (that que had about 50 people in it…I think they’d get the bronze medal in the popularity contest) and made my way back towards the Walker Art Gallery.

I felt a little bad for skipping all things Beatles while in Liverpool. That is probably the only time I’ll ever go and I sort of wanted to indulge even though I’m not really a fan. I was tempted twice by signs leading to things like Magical Mystery Tours, but instead I just took this photo from outside the “official Beatles store” (one of four in Liverpool I think):

liverpool

I spent a few hours wandering around the beautiful cultural quarter where the Walker Art Gallery is located. The Walker was quite nice, I saw a very nice Kitaj painting, as well as nice classical paintings by Reubens and Rembrandt’s Self Portrait as a Young man. Good good stuff.

kitaj - walker art gallery

Then I sat outside in the park before heading back to the train and basked in the sun that finally came out for the first extended period of time in three days.

liverpool

I’m now in London and already pleasantly overwhelmed (and pleasantly full of Indian food) at what I want to see here: two more Tates, the British Museum, National Gallery, Serpentine Gallery, Whitecube…and that’s just the art.

Leave a Comment

Manchester: Art, Gardening, Aimless Wandering

URBIS - view of Manchester

(photo collage of Manchester at URBIS)

My first full day in England. Manchester to be exact. Manchester, according to my trusty Lonely Planet England book is the capital of the north, the up and coming city that was once the heart (and was the birthplace) of capitalism and the industrial revolution, and is now claimed to be England’s Barcelona. Move over cotton and coal (which did years ago), Manchester seems to be embracing the model of 21st century creative and of course, cool urban metropolis. I may sound negative when I say that, and it may have to do with me staying in the Northern Quarter, an area of the city that Richard Florida himself may have planned out, or perhaps the city planners attended one too many of his numerous speaking engagements. From “Gay Village” to trendy fashion boutiques next to suspiciously low-key hipster bars next to empty (or nearly empty) warehouses and storefronts and currency exchanges, Manchester has swung open her doors and is actively recruiting the creative class. Walking the Northern Quarter, half intrigued by the possibility of a vintage store (I am human after all) and half afraid for my safety, I was reminded of my first time in Williamsburg a few years back. So empty, yet so ironically full.

The city itself is a stark contrast of the old and the new mashing up together quickly and feverishly, which one can’t help noticing whenever you look up to a gothic revival building only to see a crane in the distance building a high rise. I love seeing a city embrace creative people, but this seems contrived. Or perhaps I’m getting old and grumpy.

DSCF1787.JPG

It’s not all bad, I mean this stuff is happening all over the world so why should I be any more critical of Manchester? It’s not changing nearly as quick as say, Beijing. It does sadden me though to see a city so full of a rich and interesting history in such a state of change – suddenly I felt like I was in Chicago. Wicker Park about five years ago to be exact. It was comforting to feel a sense of familiarity but also disconcerting, as you will know if you’ve walked through Wicker Park recently.

Negativity aside, there are some wonderful things going on in Manchester. The three places on my to do list today were all great – The Manchester Art Gallery, Café And (yes it’s called “Café And”) and URBIS. The Manchester Art Gallery is the city’s free (wait, this England. Large amounts of government support. Ah yes, all museums and galleries are FREE!) public art space with a permanent collection on display. The MAG gifted me with seeing my very first Lucien Freud painting in person. Ask anyone who will talk art with me and they’ve probably heard of my dislike for Freud. Over rated and conceptually weak are usually the words that I use, and that was without seeing his work in the flesh. The MAG has one of his pieces from the permanent collection proudly displayed:

Freud - MAG

Yup, I still don’t get what all the fuss is about. It’s claimed that he makes his subjects sit for well over a hundred hours, leaving the subject with an expression that almost looks hunted or stalked. Nope, sorry, just looks like a modern portrait painting to me. Yes, he is skilled. But so are a lot of people who paint in the style of realism. I’m not that dogmatic but someone’s quote ran through my mind when I saw it…why not just take a photograph? For the first time since hearing this unnamed person say that, I sort of agreed.

The MAG is a nice balance of historical painting, local artistic achievements, modern and contemporary art and interactive spaces for kids. Wandering through the incredibly well-done interactive galleries I was a little surprised that two of stations referred to things of a sexual nature. I thought about this as I’ve been asked to censor the Cecelia Kettunen exhibition for elementary school groups this past year. I was asked to censor a few nude sketches (made while she was in school) and a painting of two naked women in a sauna, a scene that is probably quite familiar to anyone living in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. This was after a group of boys made a big deal about the sketches, and I’m a bit embarrassed to admit it, but I replaced them with less-nude pieces. I thought at the time that this was not the time to wage that battle. Now I’m not sure what would feel worse, the feeling of being spinelessness I now have or having to deal with a few angry phone calls from principles and parents.

Onto URBIS, an art center about the urban experience, built at the sight of the 1996 IRA bomb that devastated the commercial centre of the city. Beyond this building (beautifully designed by Simpson Architects, Manchester) this area is a nightmare; I think the Arndale Center is probably as close to purgatory in the shape of a mall that one can imagine. URBIS makes up for it though.

URBIS

It isn’t quite an “art” center…it’s more of an exhibition space about creative production. I found it incredibly fun and interesting because the self-awareness many art museums and galleries have about crossing the lines between art and science or politics or history or even design were completely gone. Instead it presented a general display of culture and the way it affects all areas of life and makes people who they are. There were four exhibitions up over four floors; a small hallway about the history of Manchester soccer (aka football), an over stimulating exhibition about how Manga has taken over the world (note to self: ask eight-year-old nephew about that), a mid-career retrospective of Mancheter-born fashion designer Matthew Williamson, and an exhibition about urban gardening. The Urban Gardening exhibition is where I landed for most of my time there.

URBIS - Urban Gardening

URBIS

URBIS - Urban Gardening

URBIS - Urban Gardening

URBIS - Urban Gardening

I found myself comparing this exhibition with the Massive Change show that was at the Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago a few years ago. That show was ridiculed for its use of corporate branding and an overall message of consumption being able to solve our environmental problems. Briefly, Massive Change was one giant advertisement for well-designed “stuff” and the exhibition itself was not very ecologically friendly (or even aware).

The Urban Gardening exhibition at URBIS was an interesting mix of product placement, education and social commentary. IKEA was a major supporter – and while I love IKEA’s designs, I don’t agree with their claim of being ecologically sound because their products – at least the ones I can afford – don’t last very long; especially if you move as much as I do. I’ve owned some Stockhom furniture in the past, and unless they’ve changed their products it’s simply particleboard with cheap laminate that peels off.

URBIS - Urban Gardening

Back to URBIS. The best thing in the Urban Gardening exhibition was the documentary film being looped about Cuba’s oil crisis that happened almost twenty years ago.

URBIS - Urban Gardening

It’s called The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil. When the Soviet Union collapsed in the 1990s, Cuba went through an incredible (and quick) change in their economy, namely losing 80 percent of their oil imports. Being isolated economically (also due to embargoes imposed by the US) and physically Cuba endured what the rest of the developed world is about to, referred to as “peak oil”. The same thing will happen globally when world oil production has reached its peak (probably about 2050) and will then start to decline even while demand continues to increase. The film suggests we look at Cuba as a model for how to deal globally with peak oil. In particular how Cuba embraced the use of bicycles (over a million were imported from China and given, for free, to citizens) as alternative transportation and as well as the rise of urban gardens. Now Cuban farmers are better off economically than any other occupation in the country (2nd note to self: keep gardening).

The DeVos Art Museum (full disclosure: I am the Director and Curator there) is hosting the Beyond Green: Toward a Sustainable Art exhibition in January 2009, an exhibition I saw in Chicago and New York. I have a great amount of respect for the exhibition (and the curator, Stephanie Smith at the University of Chicago’s Smart Museum) because it for the most part presents artists who are not creating objects to sell you to feel better about your carbon footprint, etc. I think this issue needs this approach – not how am I going to consume my way out of feeling bad, but how can I actually change the way I live either out of attempt to create change, or eventually out of necessity. I am considering looking into hosting a screening in February or March 2009 of the Peak Oil documentary.

Manchester was overall quite thought provoking. Tomorrow, Liverpool has a lot to live up to. One last thought, the food at Cafe And was good and cheap – sweet potato with veggies and cheese for 3 pounds is about as good as it’s gotten so far. And they rent independent films too.

Cafe And

Cafe And

Comments (3)

Cincinnati: Queen City

warhol

I really liked Cincinnati – I am a sucker for slightly gritty midwest cities but Cincinnati had a really good feel to it. Beyond my wonderful studio visit with Denise Burge (the museum’s first artist-in-residence this August, more on that soon), I also had some time to see some art and take in some sites.

I will also say that GPS navigators are the best invention since, well, maybe even a compass. My rental car had a GPS thing in it and I quickly gave up any technological trust issues and let the nice British woman navigate my way around the city. I made a stop at the Cincinnati Art Museum:

DSCF1119

DSCF1138
(Sol Lewitt’s collection of art up top, but not Sol Lewitt’s car on bottom)

diva2
(one of Cincinnati’s “dueling divas” of pottery)

dove
(nice Arthur Dove painting)

nevelson
(a small Louise Nevelson on the wall)

I think part of the charm of this museum was that it didn’t seem to be trying too hard – it was just doing what it did and did it pretty well. I enjoy these smaller city museums because they usually have the greatest hits, but lesser-known pieces. Less obvious and for me, more enjoyable. For instance the Louise Nevelson wall piece was almost intimate in scale – maybe 20 inches tall by 12 inches wide – which I found to be a better piece than the typical large floor sculptures on display at MoMA or the Art Institute. Even the wall labels looked nice – printed on vinyl squares a shade darker than the wall. The museum had nice signage, too. Just stuff I tend to notice.

I even enjoyed the Cincinnati ceramics show, which was surprising for me too. Perhaps it was because of the way they framed the “dueling divas” story of two woman in the late 19th century ripping off each other’s clay ideas and techniques, making it a more interesting (albeit scandalous) story.

——

DSCF1188

The Contemporary Arts Center was unfortunately disappointing. Zaha Hadid designed the building and it seemed a little pretentious. I’m not much into the current “let’s build crazy angled buildings for the sake of crazy angles!” Further, only one exhibition floor was open and it featured, guess what, a Liebeskind exhibition of 5 or 6 of his past “crazy angle” buildings. By the way the Denver Art Museum’s crazy angles are supposed to reflect Denver’s mountainous landscape…

liebeskind

I can’t wait to see that in person some day.

There was a companion show of Lewitt’s work on the same floor, but my tolerance was already growing thin in there. I stopped up on the 6th floor to see the “Unmuseum” aka the kids area. The best thing on view in the entire building was easily Simparch’s trailer made from old billboards that would roll back in forth when you get inside and move around:

simparch

I love Simparch. They constructed a huge, elevated half pipe (a functional one) in the Renaissance Center at the University of Chicago in 2000. When you walked into the gallery you couldn’t see what was going on inside the giant swimming-pool shape, you could only hear it. You had to walk up the stairs to get a glimpse of the skateboarders. They also made a radio antenna out of a huge pile of lawn chairs at DePauw in 2007. They walk a line of architecture, site-specific installation and sculpture, twisted in with some social practice, but they always seem to pull it off. It was a nice surprise to see one of their pieces in person – so the lesson is don’t skip out on the kids area in a contemporary art center – it may just be the most interesting thing you’ll see.

I also had some time to explore the city – Northside was a great neighborhood offering more of the things I miss: a good music store and slightly overpriced but mostly worth it shoe stores. I spent a few hours in my new hipster sunglasses strolling Northside with an iced coffee. It was 80 degrees out. I was smiling.

The last image is a view from behind the Cincinnati Art Museum, which sits on top of a pretty big hill overlooking the city. Guess what I saw out on the horizon next to some type of sports facility? Another crazy angled building! By guess who?

liebeskind

Comments (2)

Brooding for Broad

The New York Times has been on a rampage with the new Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) over the past week or so. Last Sunday they ran a story about Eli Broad, the patron saint and namesake of LACMA’s addition (appropriately called the Broad Contemporary Art Museum) deciding not to donate his entire collection to LACMA. When I say the entire contemporary art collection of Eli and Edythe Broad, I mean 2,000 pieces of art. Yes, 2,000. And apparently it’s a slap in the face for the museum and according to the Times, the entire LA/West coast area because that donation would have allowed Los Angeles to rival New York as being an art center.

Yawn. Where to begin with this one. First off, I will never understand the entire West Coast/East Coast rivalry with every and anything. I thought the rap/hip-hop world decided this was an unproductive battle after all, as fun as it may be to write rhymes about it. I guess I’m coming from the perspective of Chicago, who has the proverbial “Second City” (“Third City”?) chip on its shoulder that I find incredibly boring. So boring that to hear the Times refer to the East/West coast art rivalry was nearly coma-inducing. Yet I read on.

The Broad’s gave LACMA $56 million dollars to help build the new museum. That alone deserves naming rights, but I don’t think that giving LACMA $56 million also means they get to give the museum their entire collection as well. Eli Broad says (and rightly so) that to give the museum 2,000 pieces of art means 80% of it will always be in storage. He feels that if they keep the collection in control of their foundation, it will mean dispersing it to a wider audience through loans for exhibitions at other institutions and museums. I have to wonder if it’s easier for another museum (say, uh, a small remotely located university art museum) to borrow work from a private foundation than from another museum? I can’t say for certain, but probably yes. Hopefully yes.

So to that whole article, I think the Times needs to relax and tone down the conspiratorial tones. Having a large portion of a permanent collection constantly in storage is a problem for all museums. Perhaps trying something different and (gasp!) non-traditional could be a good thing in the long run.

Yesterday, the Times ran two more articles on LACMA, an architectural review of the building and a review of the first exhibition in the new Broad Contemporary Art Museum. Nicolai Ouroussoff’s review of the Renzo Piano-designed addition was pretty scathing, saying the pavilions at the front entrance may bring to mind gas station design. He goes on to say “I’ve seen gas stations in Southern California with far more architectural ambition.” Yeouch. He also goes on to claim the museum knew the building’s shortcomings, so much so they tried to HIDE the building with ART! Imagine that! Using the building to showcase the art! Chris Burden used rows of vintage streetlamps from surrounding LA neighborhoods to create an installation at the entrance that apparently hides the pavilion entrance. For shame, to make the art the focal point.

The other article in yesterday’s paper, a review of the exhibition by Roberta Smith, critiques the fact that the show was too much like a “trophy case” from the Broads collection (the Broads loaned 150 of the 180 pieces in the exhibition) and lacked curatorial focus. Well, this is probably because the museum was trying to organize an exhibition as a way to please the donors who gave the museum FIFTY-SIX MILLION dollars. This is the first show, and for $56 million, I’d let Eli and Edythe curate an entire year of exhibitions! This is the reality of the museum world people! Museums need to please the private donors and foundations in order to stay afloat and be able to grow. It just seems that the old way of thinking about museums as being a traditional model of publicly-funded (and free from the will of private interests) institutions still has a stronghold on a lot of people. Well at least a lot of the people who write about art anyway.

I do think Ms. Smith ended her review with a sense of reality and optimism though, referencing back to the Broad’s decision to not donate their entire collection to the LACMA:

“In the end the Los Angeles museum doesn’t need to own all of Mr. Broad’s art; better that its curators have a chance to choose a few really great works. Public and private collecting has the best results when approached, like making art, as an act of individual imagination spurred by the desire to be different. The goal should be to do something that no one else is doing, not the thing that everyone has already done.”

Whew, there is some hope left for poor little Los Angeles after all. With that trifecta of articles in the past week, it still looks as though New York still rules the art world though, which is incredibly convenient for the writers on that coast.

Comments (1)

Didactic, Part II

I returned to the Detroit Institute of Arts on Wednesday to take a look while the museum was not in the midst of a grand opening. My first surprise came when I tried to find parking – it was as impossible as any other major city! Go Detroit! Seriously, I was actually happy to be one of the many people walking a few blocks from their cars to the museum campus. This time I think it had more to do with the Body Worlds-type exhibit at the science museum rather than the art museum, but when it comes to Detroit I’ll take what I can get.

Secondly, I returned back to my ruminations on maps when I revisited the Julie Mehretu exhibition at the DIA. I had spent a little bit of time in the exhibition with my nephew during my Thanksgiving visit and we spent a few minutes trying to decipher what was being portrayed in some the pieces, going back and forth between the informative panels mounted next to the pieces and the actual artwork. I wanted to spend more time in there, but the combination of crowds and the short attention span of a seven-year-old prevented that.


DIA: Julie Mehretu: City Sitings

This time, alone and the museum considerably less crowded, I sat on the benches and spent nearly 45 minutes staring at the pieces, thinking. Going back again to how the pieces are didactic, how there is a message with the works, usually political and unapologetically so. For example, Mehretu calls the piece “Drift of Light (division)” “a world falling apart and coming back together again”, a world that juxtaposes public housing complexes with shopping malls using layered weighted lines and abstracted shapes. Mehretu is transposing architecture, social spaces, global markets, politics and mobility onto the surface, creating links (read: maps) between these organizations. The end result looks like a large confusing map, but these maps draw me in closer, looking for the meaning.

Could it be this simple? That while I’m often hoping for something pedantic in my visual experiences, but with room for interpretation? Really, these pieces remind me of architectural drawings in a way and what is more didactic than a drawing that is planned inch by inch, detail by detail? I think what intrigues me is the way Mehretu abstracts this information into visual cues, making the message incredibly opaque and forcing the viewer to dig deeper to find the connections and ultimately the message. I appreciate art that gives me room to interpret. Maybe her work isn’t giving an outright message. Maybe it’s more of a commentary and that’s what I find interesting. Regardless, if you are in Detroit before March 30, check it out. The works travel to WCMA in April and North Carolina in August.

Leave a Comment

Big Shoulders, Open Arms

Visiting a major city that you’ve lived in previously is a really nice way to travel. No unfamiliar hotels; rather warm beds offered up by friends. Long conversations over food that used to be a staple in your life but now feels like a special treat. That is what Chicago was for me last week, and I’m learning to appreciate it in an entirely different way.

The Midwest art tour continued in Chicago and I managed to visit the Art Institute, G2 at SAIC, the MCA, the Cultural Center, Gallery 400 and 4 or 5 galleries in about two days. And I got to spend some quality time at the always lovely InCUBATE, which defies categorization.

There is a pretty constant dialogue that runs through my head when being presented with visual culture, usually asking myself how and why I respond to certain things while others (a lot of others) are forgettable to me. Further, how and why I respond to certain things favorably while others (okay, again, a lot of others) I do not. While in Chicago I kept coming back to the word “didactic”. There were remnants from last month’s Festival of Maps around the city, particularly in exhibitions at the MCA and Gallery 400. With a background in graphic design, there is definitely something visually appealing about artists using maps in their practice, regardless of the use or intent of the map. I also find it an interesting method of keeping a critical discourse in contemporary art when it’s very easy to get caught up in the decadent (sorry Abby, I had to) abundance of the art world. Often artists who use mapping are trying to get a point across that involves a political statement or observation:

Brooke Singer

Brooke Singer, U.S. Oil Fix (at Gallery 400)

Gallery 400

Installation at Gallery 400

Didactic means to instruct and to educate, often excessively. I like looking at things that make me think, but entire rooms full of didactic displays covering a huge variety of ideas and issues is just too overwhelming. I’m definitely not sure how effective the message can be in this context. One map asks me to consider the overconsumption of oil in the U.S. compared to the rest of the world and the next asks me to read through the links an artist made of their own psychological makeup. It’s just to much and I often find myself walking through quickly and unable to focus. Not necessarily the fault of the pieces in the show, but more the fault of the exhibition (dare I blame the curators? I dare.)

I saw the Versteeg show at Rhona Hoffman while I was in Chicago and as usual, was impressed with his work:

Versteeg

Versteeg

Whether it’s writing programs that randomly select images from Flickr to project on a wall, or a faux-antique book of images of actors in Battlestar Galactica, Versteeg’s work can also be seen as similar to maps in a way that he’s dealing with the specificity of time and location and our connections to both. However, Versteeg takes it a step away from the pure presentation of where and how and why. He explores those relationships and the collapse of those relationships, often by adding on the layer of the input of technology.

Ruba Katrib wrote a good essay about Versteeg’s work in the exhibition, which can be downloaded as a PDF. I highly suggest taking a look.

Leave a Comment

Minn., Minn: Highlights

My eyes have been exposed to an overwhelming amount of art, museums, galleries and other such things related to cultural production in the past 2 days in Minneapolis. Things that caught my attention:

000_0074

Midway Contemporary Art is a non-profit space that looked more like a well-run commercial space. Only one of three galleries were open with work by Lisa Lapinski.

The work was part-installation part-photography series. It was explained to me that the artist grew up near the wall where the photo series was taken and had snapshots of it from her childhood when it was a womens bathing suit store. She reconstructed the wall and the imagery (it had been painted over by the school that was now inhabiting the building). and photographed it. Those images were hung next to images of the wall in its current state- painted with an abstract mismash of shapes, creating a nice juxtaposition of symbolism (read into how symbols reflect who is inhabiting the building, particularly along the development of art history and institutions, and I think I might be getting it).

Beyond what was on the walls, what set this space apart was the library, free and open to the public, of artist monographs, exhibition catalogues and periodicals:

Midway Library

*****
At the Minneapolis Institute of Art, there are two “folk art” galleries and that’s where I came across this painting called “Tornado Over St. Paul, 1893″ by Julius Holm:

Julius Holm

….and a portrait by Matisse called White Plumes that was from 1919. I have a feeling I know what (or maybe who) Cecelia Kettunen may have been looking at when she did her series of portraits in the 30s and 40s. Not so much the handling of the medium, but rendering of the figure and the hue structure felt similar:

Matisse

*****

At the Minneapolis College of Art and Design, they were setting up the fall BFA exhibition. It made me feel pretty good about NMU. By far the best work I saw there were 3 skyscrapers, about 3 feet tall, made from wax. Ominously mounted above them were six heat lamps, not yet turned on. The student who made the pieces wasn’t around to talk to, but if s/he were I would have suggested s/he leave the lamps off. The anticipation of what could happen seemed more interesting than what would happen after the lamps were turned on:

Surely the

*****

Finally, at the Walker, I really enjoyed Thomas Schutte’s work that was installed from the Walker’s permanent collection:

Schutte

The prints were well done, but the giant stone sculpture of the deflated woman on the steel table was subtly political and overtly humorous. Good stuff.

I also took the somewhat shoveled path behind the museum into the Turrell room:

Turrell

The room is not quite as effective in the snow since the entire piece depends on the illusion of outside/inside and about a foot of snow covered the ground inside. But, it more than made up for it when I sat down and realized that the cement benches inside were HEATED.

Turrell

*****

And finally, finally, I have my own picture of that stupid Oldenburg cherry. I think I prefer it covered in snow:

Oldenburg & van Bruggen

Leave a Comment

Older Posts »